Estimation of Intangible Costs for Factors Associated with Oral Antiviral Drugs for COVID-19 Treatment: A Conjoint Analysis in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: During the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, preferences for factors associated with vaccines have been evaluated. Three oral antiviral drugs have been approved in Japan for patients with mild-to-moderate I COVID-19 symptoms. Although preferences for the drugs may also depend on various factors, these have not been fully evaluated. METHODS: A conjoint analysis was performed based on an online survey in August 2022 to estimate the intangible costs of factors associated with oral antiviral drugs for COVID-19. Respondents were individuals aged 20-69 across Japan. The attributes included the company (Japanese/foreign) that developed the drug, formulation and size of the drug, frequency of administration per day, number of tablets/capsules per dose, number of days until no longer infectious to others, and out-of-pocket expenses. A logistic regression model was applied to estimate the utility of each level for each attribute. The intangible costs were calculated by comparing the utility to the out-of-pocket attribute. RESULTS: Responses were collected from 11,303 participants. The difference between levels was the largest for companies that developed a drug; the intangible costs were JPY 5390 higher for the foreign company than for the Japanese company. The next largest difference was in the number of days until one is no longer infectious. For the same formulation, the intangible cost was lower for small sizes than large sizes. For similar-sized tablets and capsules, the intangible cost was lower for tablets than capsules. These tendencies were similar regardless of COVID-19 infection history and the presence of risk factors for severe COVID-19 in the respondents. CONCLUSION: Intangible costs for factors associated with oral antiviral drugs among the Japanese population were estimated. The results may change as the number of people with a history of COVID-19 infection increases and significant progress is made regarding treatments.

Ensitrelvir for Mild-to-Moderate Covid-19: Phase 3 Part of Phase 2/3 Study

Background: Ensitrelvir is a SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease inhibitor approved in Japan under emergency regulatory approval system as an oral treatment for COVID-19. Here we report the key analysis results of 125 mg group of phase3 part (SCORPIO-SR). Method(s): This study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled study. Regardless of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status and presence of risk factors for severe disease, patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 within 120 hours from onset were randomized to oral administration of ensitrelvir 125 mg (375 mg loading dose on Day1), ensitrelvir 250 mg (750 mg loading dose on Day1), and placebo once daily, for 5 days. The primary endpoint was time to resolution of 5 symptoms of COVID-19 (stuffy or runny nose, sore throat, cough, feeling hot or feverish, and low energy or tiredness), and the key secondary endpoints include change from baseline on Day4 in the amount of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA and time to first negative of viral titer. The primary population for the primary and key secondary endpoints was patients with <72 hours from onset to randomization. Result(s): Median time to resolution of 5 symptoms was significantly shorter in 125 mg group (n=336, 167.9 hours) than placebo group (n=321, 192.2 hours) (p=0.0407). Mean change of viral RNA levels from baseline (log10 copies/mL) on Day4 was significantly greater in 125 mg group (-2.48) than in placebo group (-1.01) (p< 0.0001). The time to first negative of viral titer was significantly shorter in 125 mg group (n=199, 36.2 hours) compared to placebo group (n=211, 65.3 hours) (p< 0.0001). Mean changes from baseline in viral titers [log10(TCID50)/mL] were significantly greater in 125mg group on Day2 (-0.807, n=196) and Day4 (-1.108, n=197) than in the placebo group (-0.395, n=208 and -0.850, n=207, respectively) (p< 0.0001). (Table Presented) In the patients randomized within 120 hours of onset, median time to resolution of 5 symptoms was 189.7 hours in 125 mg group (n=582) and 200.3 hours in placebo group (n=572) (p=0.4352). No deaths or serious adverse drug reactions were reported in either group, and the incidence of serious adverse events between the two groups was comparable. Conclusion(s): Ensitrelvir demonstrated a significant reduction in the time to resolution of 5 typical symptoms of COVID-19, robust antiviral effects and good tolerability.

Efficacy and Safety of Ensitrelvir in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Coronavirus Disease 2019: The Phase 2b Part of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2/3 Study.

BACKGROUND: This phase 2b part of a randomized phase 2/3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of ensitrelvir for mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the Omicron epidemic. METHODS: Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to orally receive ensitrelvir fumaric acid 125 mg (375 mg on day 1) or 250 mg (750 mg on day 1) or placebo once daily for 5 days. The co-primary endpoints were the change from baseline in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) titer on day 4 and time-weighted average change from baseline up to 120 hours in the total score of predefined 12 COVID-19 symptoms. Safety was assessed through adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 341 patients (ensitrelvir 125-mg group: 114; ensitrelvir 250-mg group: 116; and placebo group: 111; male: 53.5-64.9%; mean age: 35.3-37.3 years) were included in the efficacy analyses. The change from baseline in SARS-CoV-2 titer on day 4 was significantly greater with both ensitrelvir doses than with placebo (differences from placebo: -0.41 log10 50% tissue-culture infectious dose/mL; P < .0001 for both). The total score of the 12 COVID-19 symptoms did not show a significant difference between the ensitrelvir groups and placebo group. The time-weighted average change from baseline up to 120 hours was significantly greater with ensitrelvir versus placebo in several subtotal scores, including acute symptoms and respiratory symptoms. Most adverse events were mild in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Ensitrelvir treatment demonstrated a favorable antiviral efficacy and potential clinical benefit with an acceptable safety profile. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCT2031210350 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT2031210350).

Evaluation of Drug-Drug Interactions of Ensitrelvir, a SARS-CoV-2 3CL Protease Inhibitor, With Transporter Substrates Based on In Vitro and Clinical Studies.

Drug-drug interaction potentials of ensitrelvir, a novel oral inhibitor of 3C-like protease of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, for drug transporters were evaluated by in vitro and clinical studies. The target drug transporters assessed were P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1, OATP1B3, organic anion transporter (OAT) 1, OAT3, organic cation transporter (OCT) 1, OCT2, and multidrug and toxin extrusion 1 and 2K. In vitro study revealed that ensitrelvir is a substrate for P-gp and BCRP and inhibits P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OCT1, and OAT3. Based on these results, a clinical drug-drug interaction study to evaluate the effect of ensitrelvir on the pharmacokinetics of P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, and OCT1 substrates was conducted with a cocktail approach using digoxin (P-gp substrate), rosuvastatin (BCRP, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3 substrate), and metformin (OCT1 substrate). The cocktail was administered first, and after the washout period, the cocktail was coadministered with 500 mg of ensitrelvir. No treatment-emergent adverse events were observed. Pharmacokinetic analyses demonstrated that the ratios (90% confidence intervals) of "cocktail with ensitrelvir" to "cocktail without ensitrelvir" for maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve were, respectively, 2.17 (1.72-2.73) and 1.31 (1.13-1.52) for digoxin, 1.97 (1.73-2.25) and 1.65 (1.47-1.84) for rosuvastatin, and 1.03 (0.91-1.16) and 1.02 (0.94-1.11) for metformin. The results indicate that the exposure levels of digoxin and rosuvastatin increased when coadministered with ensitrelvir, but those of metformin were not changed. In conclusion, ensitrelvir has an impact on the exposure levels of P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3 substrates.

Global prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease mutations associated with nirmatrelvir or ensitrelvir resistance.

BACKGROUND: Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) and ensitrelvir are 3-chymotrypsin-like cysteine protease (3CLpro) inhibitors which have been approved for the treatment of COVID-19 in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Previous studies have identified 3CLpro mutations that are associated with reduced susceptibility to these antivirals. The aim of the current study was to estimate the global prevalence of 3CLpro inhibitor-resistant SARS-CoV-2 strains. METHODS: We compiled a list of 3CLpro mutations which have been associated with nirmatrelvir or ensitrelvir resistance based on either viral replication or 3CLpro activity assays, and determined their prevalence among 13.4 million sequences deposited in GISAID as of December 14, 2022, about 1 year after the approval of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir. We analyzed the prevalence for different time periods, SARS-CoV-2 lineages and geographical locations. FINDINGS: Overall, 0.5% (67,095/13,446,588) of the sequences contained at least one mutation that was shown to affect the inhibitory activity of nirmatrelvir or ensitrelvir on viral replication or 3CLpro activity. We did not observe any increasing trend of resistance after the widespread clinical use of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir. G15S (2070 per million) and T21I (1386 per million) were the most prevalent mutations, and these mutations were dominant in some SARS-CoV-2 lineages. E166V and S144E, previously shown to affect the inhibitory activity of nirmatrelvir on viral replication or protease activity by > 100-folds, were found in <1 per million sequences. INTERPRETATION: Our data suggest that 3CLpro inhibitor resistance is currently rare. However, continuous global genotypic and phenotypic surveillance would be crucial in the early detection of resistant mutants. FUNDING: Richard and Carol Yu, May Tam Mak Mei Yin, The Shaw Foundation Hong Kong, Michael Tong, Marina Lee, Government Consultancy Service, the Emergency Key Program of Guangzhou Laboratory (See acknowledgements for full list).

Synthesis of deuterated S-217622 (Ensitrelvir) with antiviral activity against coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2.

S-217622 (Ensitrelvir) is a reversible severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 3-chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro) inhibitor which obtained emergency regulatory approval in Japan for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection on Nov 22, 2022. Herein, analogs of S-271622 with deuterium-for-hydrogen replacement were synthesized for comparison of the antiviral activities and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles. Compared to the parent compound, C11-d2-S-217622 compound YY-278 retained in vitro activity against 3CLpro and SARS-CoV-2. X-ray crystal structural studies showed similar interactions of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro with YY-278 and S-271622. The PK profiling revealed the relatively favorable bioavailability and plasma exposure of YY-278. In addition, YY-278, as well as S-217622, displayed broadly anti-coronaviral activities against 6 other coronaviruses that infect humans and animals. These results laid the foundation for further research on the therapeutic potential of YY-278 against COVID-19 and other coronaviral diseases.

Structural basis of nirmatrelvir and ensitrelvir activity against naturally occurring polymorphisms of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease.

SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent of COVID-19. The main viral protease (Mpro) is an attractive target for antivirals. The clinically approved drug nirmatrelvir and the clinical candidate ensitrelvir have so far showed great potential for treatment of viral infection. However, the broad use of antivirals is often associated with resistance generation. Herein, we enzymatically characterized 14 naturally occurring Mpro polymorphisms that are close to the binding site of these antivirals. Nirmatrelvir retained its potency against most polymorphisms tested, while mutants G143S and Q189K were associated with diminished inhibition constants. For ensitrelvir, diminished inhibition constants were observed for polymorphisms M49I, G143S, and R188S, but not for Q189K, suggesting a distinct resistance profile between inhibitors. In addition, the crystal structures of selected polymorphisms revealed interactions that were critical for loss of potency. In conclusion, our data will assist the monitoring of potential resistant strains, support the design of combined therapy, as well as assist the development of the next generation of Mpro inhibitors.

Ensitrelvir is effective against SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease mutants circulating globally.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been a public health concern worldwide. Ensitrelvir (S-217622) has been evaluated as an antiviral treatment for COVID-19, targeting SARS-CoV-2 3C-like protease (3CLpro). Ensitrelvir has been reported to have comparable antiviral activity against some of the SARS-CoV-2 variants: alpha, beta, gamma, delta, and omicron (BA.1.18). In this paper, we describe that ensitrelvir is effective against newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants and globally prevalent 3CLpro mutations. Ensitrelvir exhibited comparable antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 variants, including recently emerging ones: omicron (BA1.1, BA.2, BA.2.75, BA.4, BA.5, BQ.1.1, XBB.1, and XE), mu, lambda, and theta. Genetic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro, the target of ensitrelvir, was conducted using a public database and identified 11 major 3CLpro mutations circulating globally (G15S, T21I, T24I, K88R, L89F, K90R, P108S, P132H, A193V, H246Y, and A255V). The 3CLpro mutation from proline to histidine at amino acid position 132 was especially identified in the omicron variant, with prevalence of 99.69%. Enzyme kinetic assay revealed that these 3CLpro mutants have enzymatic activity comparable to that of the wild type (WT). Next, we assessed the inhibitory effect of ensitrelvir against mutated 3CLpro, with it showing inhibitory effects similar to that against the WT. These in vitro data suggest that ensitrelvir will be effective against currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants, including omicron variants and those carrying 3CLpro mutations, which emerging novel SARS-CoV-2 variants could carry.

Ensitrelvir as a potential treatment for COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: First-generation therapeutics have improved clinical outcomes in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. However, viral evolution has produced variants and subvariants capable of resisting many of these drugs and novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. AREAS COVERED: A corporate compound library screen identified ensitrelvir (formerly S-217622), a non-covalent, non-peptidic, orally bioavailable small-molecule protease inhibitor as a potential treatment for SARS-CoV-2. Ensitrelvir cleaves the active site of the 3C-like protease (3CLpro), which is conserved across SARS-CoV-2 variants and subvariants, with no human cell protease with similar specificity. EXPERT OPINION: Ensitrelvir demonstrates strong in vitro antiviral activity against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5, which have driven new waves of infection throughout 2022, suggesting a potential therapeutic option for patients with COVID-19. This manuscript reviews what is known about ensitrelvir and explores how this drug may be used in the future to address the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

A Randomized Phase 2/3 Study of Ensitrelvir, a Novel Oral SARS-CoV-2 3C-Like Protease Inhibitor, in Japanese Patients with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 or Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Results of the Phase 2a Part.

This multicenter, double-blind, phase 2a part of a phase 2/3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of ensitrelvir, a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 3C-like protease inhibitor, in Japanese patients with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sixty-nine patients were randomized (1:1:1) to orally receive 5-day ensitrelvir fumaric acid (375 mg on day 1 followed by 125 mg daily, or 750 mg on day 1 followed by 250 mg daily) or placebo and followed up until day 28. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the SARS-CoV-2 viral titer. A total of 16, 14, and 17 patients in the ensitrelvir 125 mg, ensitrelvir 250 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, were included in the intention-to-treat population (mean age: 38.0 to 40.4 years). On day 4, the change from baseline in SARS-CoV-2 viral titer (log10 50% tissue culture infectious dose/mL) in patients with positive viral titer and viral RNA at baseline was greater with ensitrelvir 125 mg (mean [standard deviation], -2.42 [1.42]; P = 0.0712) and 250 mg (-2.81 [1.21]; P = 0.0083) versus placebo (-1.54 [0.74]); ensitrelvir treatment reduced SARS-CoV-2 RNA by -1.4 to -1.5 log10 copies/mL versus placebo. The viral titer and viral RNA were similar across groups on and after day 6. The median time to infectious viral clearance decreased by approximately 50 h with ensitrelvir treatment. All adverse events were mild to moderate. Ensitrelvir treatment demonstrated rapid SARS-CoV-2 clearance and was well tolerated (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials identifier: jRCT2031210350).

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of the Novel Antiviral Agent Ensitrelvir Fumaric Acid, a SARS-CoV-2 3CL Protease Inhibitor, in Healthy Adults.

Ensitrelvir is a novel selective inhibitor of the 3C-like protease of SARS-CoV-2, which is essential for viral replication. This phase 1 study of ensitrelvir assessed its safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single (part 1, n = 50) and multiple (part 2, n = 33) ascending oral doses. Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of ensitrelvir, differences in pharmacokinetics of ensitrelvir between Japanese and white participants, and effect of ensitrelvir on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam (a cytochrome P450 3A [CYP3A] substrate) were also assessed. In part 1, Japanese participants were randomized to placebo or ensitrelvir at doses of 20, 70, 250, 500, 1,000, or 2,000 mg. In part 2, Japanese and white participants were randomized to placebo or once-daily ensitrelvir at loading/maintenance dose 375/125 mg or 750/250 mg for 5 days. Most treatment-related adverse events observed were mild in severity and were resolved without treatment. Plasma exposures showed almost dose proportionality, and geometric mean half-life of ensitrelvir following the single dose was 42.2 to 48.1 h. Food intake reduced Cmax and delayed Tmax of ensitrelvir but did not impact the area under the curve (AUC), suggesting suitability for administration without food restriction. Compared with Japanese participants, plasma exposures were slightly lower for white participants. Ensitrelvir affected the pharmacokinetics of CYP3A substrates because of increase in AUC of midazolam coadministered with ensitrelvir 750/250 mg on day 6. In conclusion, ensitrelvir was well-tolerated and demonstrated favorable pharmacokinetics, including a long half-life, supporting once-daily oral dosing. These results validate further assessments of ensitrelvir in participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection.